\"Another leak of information from the Kagoshima and Yokohama Prosecutors' Offices? Who is protecting defendant Nakano Jukichi?\"<\/a>It is being covered in the media.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe article reported that before Nakano was arrested in Japan, he had given an explanation regarding the intention to avoid being sought by foreign investigative agencies, and cited Tanaka Shigeru Ichiro as one of the people said to have accepted that explanation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What the union is interested in here is not the severity of the insulting words themselves. It is the extent to which there was a sharing of information between the person himself regarding his handling of criminal matters abroad and those involved in the management of the Shinz\u014dkai and its affiliated companies. Mr. Tanaka should be asked to explain this, and to clarify what kind of exchanges took place and what decisions were made regarding the contracts of the corporation and the management of its funds before and after that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is one thing to believe that the person concerned could have used the Japanese criminal procedure, and another thing to believe that the investigative authorities actually cooperated with that intention. From the statements alone, we need to determine the authorities\u2019 intentions; we need to compare the person\u2019s intentions with the contacts with the relevant parties and the actual actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Was the return of Mr. Nakano and the circumstances surrounding his detention taken into account when deciding on the representative of the corporation and the management methods of the assets? Did the parties mix the decision to run the corporation with the decision to accommodate Mr. Nakano\u2019s personal circumstances? This aspect is also a matter that should be examined to protect the interests of the medical corporation and the people who work there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We request verification of criminal aspects and verification of the operations and accounting of medical institutions.<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The union will address issues such as unpaid wages and promised payments, as well as clarify explanations made at the time of the contract, communicate with relevant parties, and organize the handling of funds after payment is made. It will also consider filing criminal complaints or reporting the incident to the police. The union\u2019s policy is to confirm the position and intent of each victim party and to concretize who was harmed by which actions, thereby proceeding accordingly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The investigative agencies believe that they cannot complete their investigation with just the person responsible for the matter or the account of a single legal entity, and they would like to request that they investigate the actual author of the instructions, the person who approved the contract, the person who managed the funds, and the final recipient. In order to distinguish between the authority and assets of individual legal entities, it is necessary to verify the existence of joint involvement across legal entities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Regarding the operations and accounting of medical corporations, in addition to criminal liability, there is a system for confirmation by the administrative agency in charge. Article 63, paragraph 1 of the Medical Act stipulates that if there is a suspicion of a violation of laws and regulations in operations or accounting, or if the operation is significantly suspected of lacking propriety, the prefectural governor may require a report and conduct an inspection on the spot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The union will also consider organizing the information provided and available records to seek confirmation from the administrative agency responsible for the decision-making of Shinseikai, transactions with related companies, and expenditures made to officers and related parties. We believe that rather than waiting for a conclusion as a criminal case, necessary investigations should be conducted from the perspective of protecting the assets and operations of medical institutions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What should be protected in this process are the lives of patients and users, as well as the people working on the front lines. By translating the survey\u2019s focus into individual management decisions and financial decisions, we seek to correct the problem in a way that does not compromise the continuity of healthcare and nursing care or the rights of workers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Public questions to the related corporations by Mr. Nakano Keishi, Ms. Nakano Nagisa, Mr. Nakano Keita, and Mr. Tanaka Shigeru<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The Inazaki Hospital Union requests specific explanations from New Shosei Co., Ltd., Inazaki Medical Services Co., Ltd., PRC Co., Ltd., N Co., Ltd., and their related parties regarding the following matters. If there are any discrepancies from the information provided here, please provide the differences and the basis for them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n- Please clarify the current employee and board composition of Newsei Shokai, and the timing of each individual\u2019s appointment. What procedures and decisions have been made regarding employee recruitment\/termination and board selection?<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Please provide information on the shareholders of Marasai Medical Services, PRC, and N Co., Ltd., as well as the representative directors and officers in the past. Are there any discrepancies in the information provided regarding the shareholding by N Co., Ltd. and the ownership and control by Kazuki Nakano?<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- What position did Lord Nakano Shige hold regarding contracts, hiring, grant-based projects, payments, and asset disposal with Shinseikai and its affiliated companies? Please explain the relationship between the registered office position and actual decision-making and command authority.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- What payments are being made to Nakano Nagisa, Nakano Keita, Tanaka Shigeru, and their related entities by the Shinsen Group? Please clarify the source of payment, the recipient, the amount, the timing, the nominal value, the contractual basis, the actual business content, and the approving party.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- For transactions that benefit related companies or executives themselves, who verified the terms of the transaction? Please explain the handling of conflicts of interest at employee meetings and board meetings, as well as the details of the verification by the auditor.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Regarding the declaration that agreed payments to employees, outsourced partners, and seconded personnel have not been fulfilled, how will each company respond? In addition to the payments to related parties during the same period, please provide the details of the payment decision and the resolution plan for unpaid balances.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Regarding the circumstances of Lord Kaji returning from Cambodia to Japan, is there any difference in this information? If there were any changes in the officers of the corporation, account managers, or the names of assets and decision-making methods before and after the return, please explain the reasons and the person responsible.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Did Mr. Takanoshire Akira receive an explanation from Lord Nakano Koji regarding the use of the detention in Japan to avoid prosecution abroad? In the time before and after that, what kind of communication and decisions did you make regarding the management of the Shinseikai and its related companies, contracts, and asset management?<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Will you maintain records of employee rosters, shareholders' registers, minutes, contracts, accounting, cash inflows and outflows, and business instructions, and cooperate in investigations by an independent body from the interests involved? Please identify the person responsible for determining the investigation and corrective measures.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
For those in positions of authority, there is a description corresponding to their position. For those who actually gave the instructions, there is an explanation about those instructions. For those who received the funds, there is an explanation about what they received in return. Instead of listing the names of the legal entities and the responsible individuals in order, please indicate each action as a single sequence of events.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
To protect regional healthcare, please clarify the actual state of management and funding.<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Pursuing the issues of the Shingyo Group is not about linking healthcare and nursing workers who work there to crime, nor is it about linking the people who use the services there to crime. Rather, it is an effort to ensure that businesses that are built through the efforts on the ground are not undermined by personal circumstances or inappropriate financial management by the individuals involved in the management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If the same person is involved in multiple entities, please explain in detail their involvement. If the expenditure is due to legitimate transactions, please provide proof of contracts and performance records. If there are unpaid debts, please work with the entity responsible for paying them. Building on each explanation is a starting point for addressing the suspicions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What the union is seeking is not just a vote on whether to call the criminal group a criminal organization. It is a vote on whether to reveal the facts of the criminal group\u2019s involvement in crimes based on records of the New Sai Association\u2019s general meetings and board of directors, the capital relationship through the company N, the management of Intermedical Services and PRC, and the transfer of funds to individuals and related legal entities. If the involvement in crimes is found to be acceptable, we will hold each person involved accountable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We ask that Sir Nakano Keiichi, Ms. Nakano Nagisa, Mr. Nakano Keita, Mr. Tanaka Shigeru, and the related legal entities be required to explain who decided what, who received what, and who is responsible for what. Even as the number of legal entities increases and the names of the representatives change, the explanation of payments to those who worked and the funds received will not be removed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n