[Last One Mile Labor Union] Are the funding networks of the “going-private contractor army” centered on Makoto Watanabe still active?

Defendant Tamaki Nakano's Alphard at Satsumatei

Anxiety and confusion are spreading among union members in Kagoshima.

This time, information was brought to the Last One Mile Labor Union stating that an Alphard, widely known in the surrounding area as a vehicle owned and used by Defendant Toshiyuki Nakano, was spotted at Satsumatei in Kagoshima Prefecture, which is believed to be the family home of his wife, Nagisa Nakano.

Did only the Alphard return to Kagoshima first? Or has the defendant Nakano himself also been released on bail and already come out?

The location of a single vehicle does not necessarily determine the current whereabouts of Defendant Nakano himself. However, this time, there is an accumulation of information indicating that too many people and too much money are moving in the same direction to simply dismiss it as a mere movement of a car.

Satoshi Saito, who is a certified public accountant and is said to have called himself the "IPO contractor." Defendant Shajiki Nakano, who allegedly frequently visited Last One Mile Co., Ltd. and repeatedly exchanged money with Makoto Watanabe and Saito. A private secretary who allegedly continued to perform Makoto Watanabe's personal duties while only the source of salary payments was transferred to Last One Mile. Their spouse, who has a long prison record for fraud and ties to antisocial forces, and is a person about whom information has been received indicating that they operate as Watanabe's clandestine enforcer. And the Nakano family side, which is said to be still receiving financial support.

At the center of it is Makoto Watanabe, Representative Director, Chairman, and CEO of Last One Mile Inc.

Even if it was supposed to be a gathering of IPO specialists, if the private embezzlement of company funds, ties to antisocial forces, continued support for arrested individuals, and even threatening remarks about "forcing a listed company to delist" are all concentrated within a single network, then they are no longer a group of IPO specialists.

It is a structure that can hardly be complained about even if it is called the "delisting contractor army" centered on Mr. Makoto Watanabe.

In this article, using the Alphard of the accused Tamaki Nakano as an entry point, we will investigate the support network linking together Mr. Watanabe, Mr. Saito, the private secretary, their spouse, the Nakano family, and the funds of Last One Mile Inc., which are said to have continued moving even after the arrest.

Defendant Tatsuki Nakano's Alphard was spotted at Satsumatei

According to the latest information, the Alphard, known by those around him as a vehicle owned and used by the defendant Toshiyuki Nakano, was spotted in the vicinity of "Satsumatei," believed to be the family home of his wife, Nagisa Nakano.

In a past article published in May 2026, the Last One Mile Labor Union covered reports from Cambodia regarding fraud and embezzlement allegations totaling approximately $4.6 million—roughly 700 million yen—centered around Mr. Nakano Toshiki. The article also mentioned the names of Ms. Nakano Nagisa and Mr. Nakano Keita, as well as Satsumatei, as a related location.

After that, Mr. Nakano was arrested by the Kagoshima District Public Prosecutors Office and indicted for tax evasion. Furthermore, it has been reported that he was re-arrested on suspicion of fraud and attempted fraud for allegedly defrauding subsidies, and was additionally indicted for a tax law violation involving another corporate entity.

It would be unnatural for the local community not to be stirred up now that the car of a person who was driven out of Cambodia and then subjected to repeated arrests, re-arrests, indictments, and superseding indictments in Japan has suddenly returned to a place associated with relatives in Kagoshima.

Who drove the car here? Since when has it been parked there? Who is using it now? Was the defendant Nakano himself driving it? If it wasn't him, who moved it and for what purpose? Because facts that could be explained in just a few lines are not being explained, speculation is beginning to fill the void.

Did only the car return, or did Defendant Kakuki Nakano return as well?

Since Defendant Tamaki Nakano has already been indicted, he is in a position to request bail under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Article 88, Paragraph 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure: A detained defendant or their counsel, legal representative, curator, spouse, lineal relative, or sibling may request bail.

In other words, it is procedurally possible for Defendant Nakano to request bail and for the court to grant it. While bail is not an acquittal, the fact that his physical custody will be moved outside the detention facility makes it a practical concern for the community.

As of August 12, 2026, our union has not found any new public announcements confirming defendant Nakano's bail or continued detention among the publicly available information we could verify. What can be confirmed through public reports is limited to indictment, re-arrest, and additional prosecution.

Previously, a combination of circumstances suggesting a change in custody procedures and what appeared to be external attacks on union-related targets raised questions about whether Defendant Nakano had been released.

Now the Alphard has returned here.

It is also possible that only the car returned to the family. In that case, it is only necessary to explain who moved it. If the defendant Nakano himself has also returned to Kagoshima, at the very least, an explanation should be given regarding whether or not bail or release has been granted, as well as the measures taken to prevent causing anxiety to local residents and related parties.

Without explaining anything, if you simply return the car to a place tied to your relatives while continuing to pull strings and mobilize your network behind the scenes, the union members in Kagoshima will be left with nothing but the anxiety of not knowing what is happening.

Satoshi Saito, known as the "IPO undertaker," and Defendant Shoki Nakano, who had access to Last One Mile

Satoshi Saito is indispensable when considering the support network this time.

Mr. Saito is a certified public accountant and is said to have self-identified as an "IPO contractor." Having been recruited by Mr. Makoto Watanabe, he became the General Manager of the Corporate Planning Office at Last One Mile Co., Ltd., and is said to have been involved in the company's IPO process, accounting, finance, capital policy, and relations with external stakeholders.

Meanwhile, information has previously been received that Defendant Shoki Nakano, an outsider whose official title could not be confirmed, frequently visited Last One Mile and exchanged money with related parties, including Mr. Watanabe and Mr. Saito.

Why the IPO experts are at the center of the delisting risk

Regarding Satoshi Saito, past articles have raised suspicions that he may have evaded share disposal restrictions, such as lock-ups applicable to him after Lastmile's IPO, without going through the necessary procedures.

Furthermore, there is also information that Defendant Nakano and Mr. Saito cooperated regarding shares, equity interests, collateral value, credit enhancement, and external acquisitions. If a person who was well-versed in getting companies through listing reviews ended up raising suspicions regarding share disposal restrictions and related-party management after the listing, and even continued support consultations with arrested external parties, the title of "listing contractor" begins to take on a truly ironic ring.

If your job is just to take a company public and you don't care what happens afterward, you are not an IPO contractor, you are an IPO hit-and-runner.

Was defendant Tamaki Nakano really just an outside friend?

If Defendant Nakano frequently visited Last One Mile, exchanged money with company officials, and shared information with Mr. Watanabe and Mr. Saito regarding external acquisitions, shares, responses to the National Tax Agency, and hiding whereabouts overseas, the mere fact that there was no employment contract does not erase the relationship with the company.

Entering the company office, meeting with the company's management, using the company's credit, and accessing money and stocks around the company—if, the moment a problem arises, they simply explain that "they were an outside friend," then both the visitor management and related-party management of a listed company have about as much meaning as a guestbook left at the entrance.

Furthermore, there is information that even after Defendant Nakano's arrest, Mr. Watanabe and Mr. Saito have remained in close contact with the Nakano family side to discuss future responses. If the relationship extends beyond pre-arrest association to post-arrest support, this is not a past friendship, but an ongoing support network.

Last Mile hires Makoto Watanabe's private secretary in "salary relocation"

Official Executive Introduction of Last One Mile Inc.Therefore, Makoto Watanabe is still listed as Representative Director, Chairman and CEO.

Based on the information available to our union, Mr. Watanabe's private secretary was comprehensively entrusted with the business operations of multiple companies owned or substantially controlled by Mr. Watanabe, and performed tasks such as managing Mr. Watanabe's personal schedule, handling communications, providing personal assistance, and coordinating with related parties.

However, information has been received that shortly after Mr. Watanabe assumed the position of Representative Director of Last One Mile Inc., the employer of this private secretary—in other words, the source of their salary—was switched to Last One Mile.

Has the job remained the same, but only the source of the salary payment changed to a listed company?

The issue is whether, along with the change in employer, the job duties also changed to tasks exclusively for the last mile.

Based on the information available to our union, even after the employer was changed to Last One Mile, the actual nature of the work performed by the private secretary remained unchanged; it continued to focus on attending to Mr. Watanabe's personal needs and handling operations for other companies owned or involved by Mr. Watanabe.

If the duties remain completely unchanged, but only the salary was shifted from Mr. Watanabe's private company to the listed company, then the secretary did not switch jobs to Last One Mile. It means Mr. Watanabe's private life has joined the listed company.

Having a private secretary in itself is not the problem. The issue is whether company funds—borne by Last Mile's shareholders and employees—were used to have Mr. Watanabe carry out personal tasks unrelated to Last Mile.

If there is actual work being performed, we can provide the job description, department, supervisor, work records, internal emails, deliverables, performance evaluations, and payroll approvals. The company can specifically explain what was done for the last one mile.

If there were no company duties to explain it, and company salaries were used to manage Mr. Watanabe's personal schedule, private enterprise, and personal friendships, then even if it wears the name tag of "salary," the substance remains the private appropriation of company funds.

Did they use their spouse, who allegedly served time for fraud, as their "underworld operative"?

Even more serious is the spouse of Mr. Watanabe's private secretary.

According to information received by our union, this individual has a history of serving a long prison sentence for fraud and is alleged to still maintain ties with antisocial forces. Mr. Watanabe is suspected of utilizing him as a covert operative to handle negotiations, information gathering, pressuring opponents, and resolving private disputes, despite being aware of these circumstances.

It is not just that person's past that is being called into question. The core of the issue is whether Mr. Watanabe, fully aware of his past record, connections, and the intimidation he exerts on others, mobilized him for his own purposes and had Last Mile or its affiliated companies bear the costs.

Even if there is no job title or formal employment contract, if remuneration, expenses, vehicle costs, accommodation costs, food and beverage costs, or other economic benefits are continuously received from the company, and there is operation under the instructions of the company representative, it is necessary to examine the substantive relationship.

Not giving someone a business card from a listed company does not make them unrelated to the company. If they operated using company funds, acted on behalf of the company's representative, and reported the results to that representative, an operative without a title should be managed just as strictly.

Mr. Watanabe used his personally owned credit card to have business partners make payments, creating an illicit fund flow where those expenses were paid by Last One Mile. Naturally, this leads to the suspicion that the entertainment expenses for his spouse were also, in substance, compensation borne by Last One Mile.

Did the last-mile funds flow to the Nakano family via associates of the private secretary?

This time, along with the information regarding the discovery of the Alphard, even more critical financial information has been provided.

According to the information available to our union, even after the arrest of Defendant Toshiyuki Nakano, assistance from Makoto Watanabe's side to the Nakano family has continued, and a portion of those funds is alleged to have been routed through a private secretary and their spouse.

• Information suggests that regarding Makoto Watanabe's private secretary, only the salary payment source was switched to Last One Mile Inc., while the actual work duties remained unchanged.
• Information indicates that the spouse of the private secretary, regardless of whether they hold an official title, has been continuously operating under Mr. Watanabe's instructions.
• Information that funds disbursed from the last mile or affiliated companies are flowing to the Nakano family side via persons related to the private secretary.
• Information that even after Defendant Nakano's arrest, Mr. Watanabe and Mr. Satoshi Saito have repeatedly contacted or met with the Nakano family side to discuss future responses.
• During that time, an Alphard, alleged to be owned and used by Defendant Nakano, was confirmed at a location believed to be his wife's family home.

If this sequence of events is true, it creates a structure where the company's payroll and expenses flow sequentially to Mr. Watanabe's personal secretary, his spouse, and the Nakano family side. This would mean that the "last mile" of accounting was not a ledger recording the company's business activities, but rather a route map outlining Mr. Watanabe's personal support network.

If Mr. Watanabe were to support friends and their families using his own wealth, it would first be a matter of personal relationships. However, the moment he opens the "last-mile" wallet, it becomes an issue for shareholders, employees, business partners, and the market as a whole.

We need to investigate whether company funds were used for Defendant Nakano's legal fees, bail deposit, living expenses, family support, vehicle relocation and maintenance costs, or other expenses. We need to check whether funds were channeled through secretary salaries, outsourcing fees, expense reimbursements, or payments to related companies instead of direct remittances. Rather than looking just at the name on the payment, we need to investigate who ultimately benefited.

Furthermore, if Mr. Watanabe and Mr. Saito discussed matters with the Nakano family after the defendant Nakano's arrest, the purpose of those discussions should also be clarified.

Were they discussing normal defense policies or family support funded by private means? Or were they discussing company funds, post-bail living, vehicles, devices, evidence, statements, communication with related parties, and even responses to overseas authorities? By checking the dates and times of the meetings, participants, communication history, remittances, and agenda, it becomes clear whether it was merely a consultation between friends or an organized support plan.

The "Delisting Contractor Corps" centered around Mr. Makoto Watanabe

Organizing the roles of the individuals who have appeared so far reveals a division of labor that is brilliantly executed, to the point where it is no laughing matter for a listed company.

• Satoshi Saito is said to have called himself a "listing contractor," a figure who was involved in public listings, accounting, finance, shares, and capital policy as the general manager of the corporate planning office.
• Defendant Nakano Tatsuyoshi is a figure who has been reported to frequently visit Last Mile and was involved with Mr. Watanabe and Mr. Saito regarding money, shares, external acquisitions, and overseas operations.
• Mr. Watanabe's private secretary is reportedly a person whose salary source was transferred to Last One Mile while leaving the scope of their duties almost unchanged.
• Information has been received that the spouse of the private secretary has a long prison record for fraud and ties to anti-social forces, and is acting as Watanabe's covert enforcer.
• According to sources, information has been received that even after the arrest of the defendant Nakano, the Nakano family has continued to receive financial, living, vehicle, and other forms of support from Mr. Watanabe's side.
• Makoto Watanabe is the Chairman and CEO of Last One Mile Co., Ltd., acting as the central figure connecting these people, funds, companies, and directions.

If Mr. Saito undertook the IPO, Defendant Nakano frequented the company to move money, the private secretary attended to Mr. Watanabe's personal needs, that secretary's spouse acted as the covert operative, and funds reached the Nakano family—if Last Mile bore those expenses, then the funds and credit of a listed company were converted into operating expenses for a private organization centered around Mr. Watanabe.

Furthermore, Mr. Watanabe is alleged to have made statements regarding another listed company that opposed him, to the effect of "forcing it to delist, even if it means dragging it down with me."

While boasting about getting other companies delisted, his own company is piling up suspicions of ties to anti-social forces, the private misappropriation of corporate funds, support for arrested individuals, and retaliation against whistleblowers. At this rate, rather than taking on the delisting of other companies, it is like self-contracting the risk of its own delisting.

They are truly a "delisting contractor army."

However, that amusement only goes as far as the name. If the last-mile funds are being used to finance those activities, the burden that cannot be laughed off is forced upon well-meaning employees, shareholders, and business partners.

If corporate funds were diverted into a personal support network, charges of aggravated breach of trust and embezzlement on the job will apply.

Directors have a duty to perform their duties for the company, rather than using the company's property for themselves or their friends.

Article 355 of the Companies Act: Directors shall comply with laws and regulations, the articles of incorporation, and resolutions of shareholders meetings, and shall faithfully perform their duties for the stock company.

If the company paid a salary to a private secretary who did not perform last-mile operations, used that secretary's spouse as Mr. Watanabe's personal operative force, and further funneled funds to the Nakano family side, it cannot be called duties faithfully performed for the sake of the corporation.

Article 960, Paragraph 1 of the Companies Act: When any of the following persons, for the purpose of promoting their own or a third party's interest or inflicting damage on a stock company, acts in breach of their duties and inflicts financial damage on the stock company, they shall be punished by imprisonment with work for not more than 10 years or a fine of not more than 10 million yen, or both.

Item 3 of the same paragraph includes directors within its scope. If company funds are used to provide economic benefits to one's private secretary, associates, friends, or friends' families, thereby causing damage to the company, the question of whether the crime of aggravated breach of trust is established will be examined.

Article 253 of the Penal Code: A person who embezzles another person's property that he or she possesses in the pursuit of business shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten years.

Depending on the specific method of expenditure, such as who managed the company funds, who approved the payments, and who became the ultimate beneficiary, the crime of embezzlement in the course of business may also be considered.

It is not a system where calling it a salary makes it safe, calling it an outsourcing fee makes it safe, or calling it an expense reimbursement makes it safe. What is questioned is whether there is substance for the company, whether there is work commensurate with the compensation, and whose benefit it ultimately served.

If the employment of the secretary was appropriate, you can show the employment contract, job description, work records, and deliverables. If the payment to the spouse was appropriate, you can show the contract, work reports, invoices, and deliverables. If there was no transfer of funds to the Nakano family side, it can be disproven with bank records and accounting ledgers.

Without showing them, you cannot just brush it off by saying "because they are a secretary," "because they are an acquaintance," or "because the chairman decided so." The safe of a listed company is not a family credit card for automatically wiring money to the chairman's social circle.

Open questions to Defendant Tamaki Nakano, Mr. Makoto Watanabe, Mr. Satoshi Saito, and Last One Mile Co., Ltd.

1. Is Defendant Tamaki Nakano still in custody, or has he been released on bail or through other procedures?
2. If defendant Nakano has been bailed or released, is there any fact that he returned to Kagoshima Prefecture and entered or exited the vicinity of "Satsumatei"?
3. Who is the person who moved the Alphard, which is considered to be a vehicle owned and used by Defendant Nakano, to the vicinity of "Satsumatei"?
4. Who currently uses or manages the Alphard in question? Is there any fact that Defendant Nakano himself used it?
5. Who is paying for the maintenance costs of the vehicle in question, such as transportation costs, insurance premiums, parking fees, vehicle inspection fees, and other expenses?
6. Did Defendant Nakano, after the arrest, contact Makoto Watanabe, Satoshi Saito, a private secretary to Mr. Watanabe, the secretary's spouse, or individuals related to Last One Mile Inc., either directly or through a third party?
7. Did Mr. Watanabe and Mr. Saito meet, speak by phone, or hold an online meeting with the Nakano family side after Defendant Nakano's arrest?
8. If you go, please clarify the date and time, participants, agenda, and decisions made.
9. During the consultation, did you discuss bail requests, defense strategy, bail bonds, living expenses, vehicles, place of residence, dealing with overseas authorities, contacting related parties, or evidence or statements?
10. Did Satoshi Saito involve himself in financial support, bail support, accounting processing, or remittances via companies or related companies directed toward the defendant Nakano or the Nakano family side?
11. Did Mr. Saito, while involved in the listing of Last One Mile Inc. as a "listing contractor," report the financial and stock relationships between the defendant Nakano and the company to the Board of Directors, the Audit and Supervisory Committee, and the accounting auditor?
12. What is the date when Mr. Watanabe's private secretary was switched to employment by Last One Mile Co., Ltd.? Who approved the hiring and salary amount?
13. How did the secretary's job duties, department, supervisor, and work location change before and after the change of employer?
14. Please provide the deliverables created by the secretary for the last mile, work records, internal emails, and personnel evaluations.
15. What is the total amount paid by the company for the secretary in question, including salary, bonuses, expenses, housing costs, vehicle costs, travel expenses, and any other company-covered expenses?
16. Does the secretary's spouse have an employment, outsourcing, advisory, referral, security, negotiation, or other contractual or de facto relationship with Last One Mile or a group company?
17. Did Last One Mile or any of its affiliated companies pay the spouse in question any compensation, expenses, meal expenses, lodging expenses, travel expenses, vehicle expenses, or other monies?
18. Did Mr. Watanabe ask the said spouse to gather information, negotiate with the other party, intimidate, monitor, transfer funds, or provide support to the Nakano family side?
19. Are there any facts showing that, after the arrest of Defendant Nakano, funds from Last One Mile Inc. or its related companies were transferred to the Nakano family through private secretaries, their spouses, or other third parties?
20. If funds are transferred, please clarify the amount, payment date, payment purpose, ultimate beneficiary, decision-maker, and accounting treatment.
21. Did Last One Mile or any of its affiliated companies directly or indirectly cover Defendant Nakano’s legal fees, bail bond, living expenses, financial support for his family, vehicle expenses, or other costs?
22. Do the Board of Directors and the Audit and Supervisory Committee have information that Mr. Watanabe made remarks to the effect of "driving other listed companies to delist" and mobilized Last One Mile's funds and personnel for that purpose?
23. Does the Board of Directors and the Audit and Supervisory Committee of Last One Mile grasp the working conditions of the private secretary, the payments made to the spouse, the financial support provided to the Nakano family side, and the custody status of Defendant Nakano?
24. Will you immediately preserve payroll ledgers, attendance records, internal emails, chats, bank transfers, expense reports, meeting minutes, vehicle logs, and communications with the Nakano family side, and submit them to an independent third-party investigation?

Measures Sought by the Last Mile Labor Union

1. Defendant Nakano Tatsuyoshi or his defense counsel must explain whether or not he was granted bail and released, and whether or not he has returned to Kagoshima Prefecture.
2. Disclose the person who moved Defendant Nakano’s Alphard, the date it was moved, its current user, and who bore the costs.
3. Last Mile Corporation shall conduct an independent investigation regarding the recruitment, working conditions, salary, expenses, and deliverables of the private secretary.
4. Investigate the spouse of the private secretary, as well as “Last One Mile,” the group companies, and the contract, payments, instructions, and actual activities involving Mr. Makoto Watanabe.
5. Verify bank records, accounting ledgers, and expense records to determine whether any funds were transferred—directly or via third parties—from Last Mile or affiliated companies to the Nakano family.
6. Investigate whether company funds have been used to cover Defendant Nakano’s legal fees, bail bond, living expenses, family support costs, and vehicle expenses.
7. Suspend payments for questionable secretary salaries, outsourcing costs, related party expenses, and payments to the Nakano family until the investigation is completed.
8. Exclude Mr. Watanabe and Mr. Satoshi Saito from the selection of the contractor for the said investigation, data collection, interviews with relevant parties, and approval of the investigation results.
9. If the misappropriation of company funds is confirmed, Mr. Watanabe and other beneficiaries must be required to return the full amount to the company, and they must be held liable under both civil and criminal law.
10. Preserve records regarding communications, meetings, remittances, and vehicle movements by Mr. Watanabe, Mr. Saito, the Nakano family side, private secretaries and their spouses after the arrest of defendant Nakano.
11. The Board of Directors and the Audit and Supervisory Committee shall conduct an independent investigation into Mr. Watanabe’s notice of delisting to other companies, his threatening remarks and behavior, and his personal use of company funds and personnel.
12. Report the results of the investigation to the Board of Directors, the Audit and Supervisory Committee, the independent auditors, major shareholders, and relevant market authorities, and disclose them to the public as appropriate based on their materiality.

Do not force the union members in Kagoshima to clean up the mess left by the "delisting contractor army."

Satoshi Saito, who is said to have boasted that he could undertake IPOs.

Defendant Sakuki Nakano is alleged to have frequently visited Last One Mile Co., Ltd. and engaged in repeated exchanges of money and stock with its management.

Information has been received regarding Makoto Watanabe's private secretary, who allegedly received a salary from the company despite not performing any last-mile operations, and his spouse, who reportedly has a history of long-term imprisonment for fraud and ties to antisocial forces, yet acts as Watanabe's clandestine enforcer.

Makoto Watanabe is suspected of using his network and company funds to continue providing support to the Nakano family.

If all of these are operating as a single support network, the biggest delisting risk facing Last Mile Co., Ltd. is neither the market environment nor competing companies.

This is the very group suspected of infiltrating listed companies and using their funds, personnel, and credit for their own purposes.

If Mr. Watanabe, known for threatening to "drive other companies to delist," is channeling Last One Mile's funds to Mr. Saito, the accused Nakano, a private secretary, their spouse, and the Nakano family, thereby endangering his own company's listing, it would truly make them a delisting contractor squad centered around Mr. Watanabe.

Before taking on the delisting of other companies, we are jointly engineering the risk of our own delisting. How long will the Board of Directors and the Audit and Supervisory Committee continue to ignore this irony as a joke they cannot laugh at?

It is only natural that members in Kagoshima feel uneasy seeing Defendant TSUKI NAKANO's Alphard. Regarding Defendant Nakano, a great deal of information has been submitted so far concerning suspicions of massive fraud and embezzlement in Cambodia, a tax evasion case in Japan, a subsidy fraud case, his relationships with Makoto Watanabe and Satoshi Saito, and a support network that reportedly includes individuals with ties to anti-social forces.

Given the circumstances, if the Alphard—believed to be owned and driven by the individual—were to return to a location associated with his relatives, it would be only natural to wonder, “Has he returned as well?” or “Is someone still providing him with support?”

However, you do not need to go alone to check the vehicle or the person while feeling anxious. Please do not track the vehicle, enter the premises, confront store employees or local residents, or make direct contact with the defendant Nakano or related parties.

If there are any dates, times, locations, vehicle conditions, or entry/exit of individuals that you were able to legally confirm from a safe place, please record them while your memory is fresh and share them with our union. If you experience intimidation, contact, surveillance, harassment, or any other threatening behavior, do not handle it alone; the union will support you, including consulting with the police and lawyers.

Confirmation and pursuit will be handled by the union. To all union members in Kagoshima, please prioritize the safety of yourselves and your families above all else.

If you are out on bail, you simply need to explain that fact. If only the car was returned, you simply need to explain who moved it. If there is no assistance from company funds, you simply need to show records of your salary, expenses, and remittances.

The current situation itself is abnormal, where just seeing a single Alphard causes Kagoshima union members to have to worry about Makoto Watanabe, Satoshi Saito, individuals alleged to have ties to antisocial forces, and even the financial support network of Last One Mile Co., Ltd.

Did only the car return, or did Defendant Kakuki Nakano return as well?

The responsibility for providing that answer does not lie with the union members in Kagoshima who spotted the vehicle. It lies with Defendant Hiroki Nakano, Mr. Makoto Watanabe, Mr. Satoshi Saito, and the Board of Directors and Audit and Supervisory Committee of Last One Mile Inc.

I will not allow the burden of the delisting risk created by those who boast of having undertaken the listing to be placed on the Kagoshima union members.